Wikipedia:Articles for deletion/University of Saskatchewan Students' Union
- The following discussion is an archived debate of the proposed deletion of the article below. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.
The result was delete. Mark Arsten (talk) 00:38, 5 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- University of Saskatchewan Students' Union (edit | talk | history | protect | delete | links | watch | logs | views) – (View log · Stats)
- (Find sources: Google (books · news · scholar · free images · WP refs) · FENS · JSTOR · TWL)
Contested prod. Unclear notability, referenced nearly entirely with primary sources. Maclean's article is focused on one event. Lacks significant coverage in 3rd party sources where the subject of this article is the focus of that coverage. RadioFan (talk) 01:06, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete - Endorse nomination and also, the article seems to lack significant coverage, a in-depth research only brings vague information, or event focused in WP:ONEEVENT. Eduemoni↑talk↓ 02:08, 15 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Canada-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Organizations-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:26, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Note: This debate has been included in the list of Schools-related deletion discussions. • Gene93k (talk) 00:27, 16 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, —Tom Morris (talk) 19:30, 22 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Relisted to generate a more thorough discussion so a clearer consensus may be reached.
- Please add new comments below this notice. Thanks, Dusti*Let's talk!* 05:51, 29 July 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- Delete This article appears to be an advertisement and clearly appears to be written by some one associated with the same . It lacks neutrality.Zeeshankm —Preceding undated comment added 02:13, 1 August 2013 (UTC)[reply]
- The above discussion is preserved as an archive of the debate. Please do not modify it. Subsequent comments should be made on the appropriate discussion page (such as the article's talk page or in a deletion review). No further edits should be made to this page.